Instructions: Listen to the essay carefully. Take at least two minutes after the reading to complete the following notes, and then share your reactions orally with the writer. Submit the completed form to your teacher at the end of the Peer Response activity.
(+) (-) (?)
WHAT WORKS? WHAT DOESN’T? QUESTIONS?
(praise) (polish) (question)
+ The facts that she has researched and stated.
+ The descriptive of what the museum stands for.
- There is no input on what she thinks of the museum.
- There are just definitions of everything but readers need to read something with more life.
? Because there is a lot of description, there are no questions for me.
Instructions: Listen to the essay carefully. Take at least two minutes after the reading to complete the following notes, and then share your reactions orally with the writer. Submit the completed form to your teacher at the end of the Peer Response activity.
(+) (-) (?)
WHAT WORKS? WHAT DOESN’T? QUESTIONS?
(praise) (polish) (question)
I like the research that was done, gives you a good idea.
Gives good descriptive.
Has many facts, it seems that the person knows the topic very well.
The interview was specific and well put together.
Try to put more of your own feeling in the essay how you feel, about this.
Instructions: Listen to the essay carefully. Take at least two minutes after the reading to complete the following notes, and then share your reactions orally with the writer. Submit the completed form to your teacher at the end of the Peer Response activity.
(+) What works? (praise)
Good descriptions
Has a lot of information
(-) What Doesn’t (polish)
Seems like a boring research paper
too much descriptions
Could add a little more of herself on the paper.
Notes for Peer’s Oral Response
Essay # 2
Writer: Kanwal Jehan Peer Respondent: Altea Shehu
Instructions: Listen to the essay carefully. Take at least two minutes after the reading to complete the following notes, and then share your reactions orally with the writer. Submit the completed form to your teacher at the end of the Peer Response activity.
(+) (-) (?)
WHAT WORKS? WHAT DOESN’T? QUESTIONS?
(praise) (polish) (question)
+ The facts that she has researched and stated.
+ The descriptive of what the museum stands for.
- There is no input on what she thinks of the museum.
- There are just definitions of everything but readers need to read something with more life.
? Because there is a lot of description, there are no questions for me.
Notes for Peer’s Oral Response
Essay # _____
Writer ____ Kanwal Jehan _________ Peer Respondent ___ Rexhina Ziti ________
Instructions: Listen to the essay carefully. Take at least two minutes after the reading to complete the following notes, and then share your reactions orally with the writer. Submit the completed form to your teacher at the end of the Peer Response activity.
(+) (-) (?)
WHAT WORKS? WHAT DOESN’T? QUESTIONS?
(praise) (polish) (question)
I like the research that was done, gives you a good idea.
Gives good descriptive.
Has many facts, it seems that the person knows the topic very well.
The interview was specific and well put together.
Try to put more of your own feeling in the essay how you feel, about this.
Notes for Peer’s Oral Response
Essay # __2___
Writer _Kanwal Jehan___ Peer Respondent _______Phanessa Jean________
Instructions: Listen to the essay carefully. Take at least two minutes after the reading to complete the following notes, and then share your reactions orally with the writer. Submit the completed form to your teacher at the end of the Peer Response activity.
(+) What works? (praise)
Good descriptions
Has a lot of information
(-) What Doesn’t (polish)
Seems like a boring research paper
too much descriptions
Could add a little more of herself on the paper.
(?) Questions?
What are your impressions of the museum?